diff options
author | Martin Braun <martin.braun@ettus.com> | 2021-07-06 16:51:55 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Aaron Rossetto <aaron.rossetto@ni.com> | 2021-10-19 12:21:33 -0700 |
commit | b6119e581e6ea9273b188463dc4529c30db140ba (patch) | |
tree | 11517bfd9cff0f0e37120b10c72b4387f7d509a6 /host/lib/usrp_clock | |
parent | 01d81c7fa5e43210a40c61ce39287c7be245f7c4 (diff) | |
download | uhd-b6119e581e6ea9273b188463dc4529c30db140ba.tar.gz uhd-b6119e581e6ea9273b188463dc4529c30db140ba.tar.bz2 uhd-b6119e581e6ea9273b188463dc4529c30db140ba.zip |
uhd: Replace Boost mutexes and locks with standard options
This is a very mechanical task that could almost have been done with
sed. Boost versions of mutexes and locks were removed, and replaced with
std:: versions. The replacement tables are as follows:
== Mutexes ==
- boost::mutex -> std::mutex
- boost::recursive_mutex -> std::recursive_mutex
Mutexes behave identically between Boost and std:: and have the same
API.
== Locks ==
C++11 has only two types of lock that we use/need in UHD:
- std::lock_guard: Identical to boost::lock_guard
- std::unique_lock: Identical to boost::unique_lock
Boost also has boost::mutex::scoped_lock, which is a typedef for
boost::unique_lock<>. However, we often have used scoped_lock where we
meant to use lock_guard<>. The name is a bit misleading, "scoped lock"
sounding a bit like an RAII mechanism. Therefore, some previous
boost::mutex::scoped_lock are now std::lock_guard<>.
std::unique_lock is required when doing more than RAII locking (i.e.,
unlocking, relocking, usage with condition variables, etc.).
== Condition Variables ==
Condition variables were out of the scope of this lock/mutex change, but
in UHD, we inconsistently use boost::condition vs.
boost::condition_variable. The former is a templated version of the
latter, and thus works fine with std::mutex'es. Therefore, some
boost::condition_variable where changed to boost::condition.
All locks and mutexes use `#include <mutex>`. The corresponding Boost
includes were removed. In some cases, this exposed issues with implicit
Boost includes elsewhere. The missing explicit includes were added.
Diffstat (limited to 'host/lib/usrp_clock')
-rw-r--r-- | host/lib/usrp_clock/octoclock/octoclock_impl.hpp | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | host/lib/usrp_clock/usrp_clock_c.cpp | 14 |
2 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/host/lib/usrp_clock/octoclock/octoclock_impl.hpp b/host/lib/usrp_clock/octoclock/octoclock_impl.hpp index 86fd5342d..f469f2dff 100644 --- a/host/lib/usrp_clock/octoclock/octoclock_impl.hpp +++ b/host/lib/usrp_clock/octoclock/octoclock_impl.hpp @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ #include <uhd/usrp/gps_ctrl.hpp> #include <uhd/usrp/mboard_eeprom.hpp> #include <uhd/usrp_clock/octoclock_eeprom.hpp> -#include <boost/thread.hpp> #include <memory> +#include <mutex> uhd::device_addrs_t octoclock_find(const uhd::device_addr_t& hint); @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ private: std::string _get_images_help_message(const std::string& addr); - boost::mutex _device_mutex; + std::mutex _device_mutex; }; #endif /* INCLUDED_OCTOCLOCK_IMPL_HPP */ diff --git a/host/lib/usrp_clock/usrp_clock_c.cpp b/host/lib/usrp_clock/usrp_clock_c.cpp index ea67c7e6e..c0408bc5e 100644 --- a/host/lib/usrp_clock/usrp_clock_c.cpp +++ b/host/lib/usrp_clock/usrp_clock_c.cpp @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ #include <uhd/usrp_clock/usrp_clock.h> #include <uhd/utils/static.hpp> #include <string.h> -#include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp> #include <map> +#include <mutex> /**************************************************************************** * Registry / Pointer Management @@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ UHD_SINGLETON_FCN(usrp_clock_ptrs, get_usrp_clock_ptrs); /**************************************************************************** * Generate / Destroy API calls ***************************************************************************/ -static boost::mutex _usrp_clock_find_mutex; +static std::mutex _usrp_clock_find_mutex; uhd_error uhd_usrp_clock_find(const char* args, uhd_string_vector_t* devices_out) { UHD_SAFE_C( - boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(_usrp_clock_find_mutex); + std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(_usrp_clock_find_mutex); uhd::device_addrs_t devs = uhd::device::find(std::string(args), uhd::device::CLOCK); @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ uhd_error uhd_usrp_clock_find(const char* args, uhd_string_vector_t* devices_out : devs) { devices_out->string_vector_cpp.push_back(dev.to_string()); }) } -static boost::mutex _usrp_clock_make_mutex; +static std::mutex _usrp_clock_make_mutex; uhd_error uhd_usrp_clock_make(uhd_usrp_clock_handle* h, const char* args) { - UHD_SAFE_C(boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(_usrp_clock_make_mutex); + UHD_SAFE_C(std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(_usrp_clock_make_mutex); size_t usrp_clock_count = usrp_clock_ptr::usrp_clock_counter; usrp_clock_ptr::usrp_clock_counter++; @@ -76,10 +76,10 @@ uhd_error uhd_usrp_clock_make(uhd_usrp_clock_handle* h, const char* args) (*h)->usrp_clock_index = usrp_clock_count;) } -static boost::mutex _usrp_clock_free_mutex; +static std::mutex _usrp_clock_free_mutex; uhd_error uhd_usrp_clock_free(uhd_usrp_clock_handle* h) { - UHD_SAFE_C(boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(_usrp_clock_free_mutex); + UHD_SAFE_C(std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(_usrp_clock_free_mutex); if (!get_usrp_clock_ptrs().count((*h)->usrp_clock_index)) { return UHD_ERROR_INVALID_DEVICE; |