| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a very mechanical task that could almost have been done with
sed. Boost versions of mutexes and locks were removed, and replaced with
std:: versions. The replacement tables are as follows:
== Mutexes ==
- boost::mutex -> std::mutex
- boost::recursive_mutex -> std::recursive_mutex
Mutexes behave identically between Boost and std:: and have the same
API.
== Locks ==
C++11 has only two types of lock that we use/need in UHD:
- std::lock_guard: Identical to boost::lock_guard
- std::unique_lock: Identical to boost::unique_lock
Boost also has boost::mutex::scoped_lock, which is a typedef for
boost::unique_lock<>. However, we often have used scoped_lock where we
meant to use lock_guard<>. The name is a bit misleading, "scoped lock"
sounding a bit like an RAII mechanism. Therefore, some previous
boost::mutex::scoped_lock are now std::lock_guard<>.
std::unique_lock is required when doing more than RAII locking (i.e.,
unlocking, relocking, usage with condition variables, etc.).
== Condition Variables ==
Condition variables were out of the scope of this lock/mutex change, but
in UHD, we inconsistently use boost::condition vs.
boost::condition_variable. The former is a templated version of the
latter, and thus works fine with std::mutex'es. Therefore, some
boost::condition_variable where changed to boost::condition.
All locks and mutexes use `#include <mutex>`. The corresponding Boost
includes were removed. In some cases, this exposed issues with implicit
Boost includes elsewhere. The missing explicit includes were added.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The checks from the new clang-tidy file are applied to the source tree
using:
$ find . -name "*.cpp" | sort -u | xargs \
--max-procs 8 --max-args 1 clang-tidy --format-style=file \
--fix -p /path/to/compile_commands.json
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Pragma once is the more modern version of include guards, eliminating
any potential problems with mistyping include guards. Let's use those.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Note: template_lvbitx.{cpp,hpp} need to be excluded from the list of
files that clang-format gets applied against.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is mostly a search-and-replace operation, with few exceptions:
- boost::function has a clear() method. In C++11, this is achieved by
assigning nullptr to the std::function object.
- The empty() method is replaced by std::function's bool() operator
|
| |
|
|
| |
Boost moved this around in version 1.58.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes the build errors that occur due to switching locations of
noncopyable.hpp within Boost, and also allows us to remove
boost::noncopyable in one fell swoop.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- expert_nodes.hpp: fix to work with BOOST_VERSION < 105600, since UHD
still supports Boost 1.53.00.
- gpio_atr_3000.hpp: requires boost::noncopyable header, so replicate
that (now) in export_nodes.hpp.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Header wasn't included until Boost 1.56.
Fixes 5c012cad7858 ("lib: experts: Add potentially missing but...")
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This adds an include for boost/core/noncopyable.hpp. Without it, builds
would potentially fail on Boost 1.69++.
|
|
|
To avoid the proliferation of additional include directories and
multiple ways of including project-local headers, we now default to
moving all headers that are used across UHD into the uhdlib/
subdirectory.
Some #include statements were also reordered as they were modified for
closer compliance with the coding guidelines.
Internal cpp source files should now include files like this:
#include <uhdlib/rfnoc/ctrl_iface.hpp>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Chaudhari <ashish.chaudhari@ettus.com>
|
