From 4d8310ae0ffe1f78a2b8623d55f63ae504ff1aa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Matthias P. Braendli" Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 08:36:03 +0100 Subject: Make DPD Feedback server SDRDevice-agnostic --- TODO | 21 +++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'TODO') diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index be42465..a566ff9 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ Unless written, no activity has been started on the topics. TODOs for ongoing SDR output refactoring ---------------------------------------- +Currently, all the frontend tuning and timestamping settings are UHD-specific. +To make it possible to run with synchronised=1 using Soapy, refactoring the +output to share the parts that are common. + +This would enable SFN support with LimeSDR devices. + + Clean up and separate GPS and refclk checks. @@ -13,10 +20,13 @@ Add antenna selection to config. Add refclk stuff and timestamps to Soapy. -Make an abstraction for the DPD feedback server, use it for Soapy and UHD. +*done* Make an abstraction for the DPD feedback server, use it for Soapy and UHD. Move staticdelay into a new process block +Double-check all #includes + +Move other non SDR outputs to the output folder. Tests, both with B200 and LimeSDR: - No timestamps @@ -41,15 +51,6 @@ However, when enabled, some receivers are not able to lock on the signal. Is the power of the TII too strong? Synchronisation wrong? -Rework Soapy and UHD outputs ----------------------------- -Currently, all the frontend tuning and timestamping settings are UHD-specific. -To make it possible to run with synchronised=1 using Soapy, refactoring the -output to share the parts that are common. - -This would enable SFN support with LimeSDR devices. - - Finalise EDI input ------------------ The EDI input, based on work started in http://git.mpb.li/git/odr-edilib/ -- cgit v1.2.3